W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Graph store protocol editor's draft updated

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:05:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKSO3ukF7ZfP5Q_D5JOirutSLy9NLggtCv_FerYoBMFy7j-HWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote:
> Somewhat relatedly, I went to try to find text in the GSP document about support for default graphs. I was surprised that I couldn't find any real statement that a graph store actually supports a default graph.

The GSP document has the following explicit text (in section 4.2):

"In a similar manner, a query component comprised of the string
default can be used to indicate that the operation indirectly
identifies the default graph in the Graph Store."

Were you looking for something else beyond this?
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 11:06:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT