- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:57:43 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 13/02/12 19:08, Steve Harris wrote: > I'm not confident that I understand the response - isn't %hh and \x > different, e.g. \x will epxand to some unicode character, but %hh > will remain as %hh? The technical point isn't necessary for the response so I've taken it out. It's just the overlap with "%" gives different ways to the same result. At this stage, I suggest we leave it as-is. :foo%20bar and :foo\%20bar are the same characters in an IRI. (While % should only even be followed by 2 hex digits, I would observe, that isn't always so in the wild). Andy > > - Steve > > On 12 Feb 2012, at 17:27, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> Comment: "Feedback on character escape sequences in the local >> names" >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0001 >> >> >> Response: >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-18 >> >> Summary: We are going to keep the feature. >> >> Andy >> >
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 08:58:09 UTC