W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: comment response for MO-1

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:26:51 +0000
Message-ID: <4F28326B.7050700@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
The response is OK.

The SD doc could make it clearer about this - how does one say "the
entire web" as opposed to "none"?

to a description of the graphs where the service limits the scope of the 
construction of a dataset either via the SPARQL Protocol, with FROM/FROM 
NAMED clauses in a query, or with USING/USING NAMED in an update request.


On 31/01/12 16:26, Gregory Williams wrote:
> I've written a response to the recent comment on service descriptions from Marcel Otto:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MO-1
> The response attempts to clear up what is a misunderstanding on the use and description of the default dataset, and the allowable graphs for specifying a custom dataset.
> thanks,
> .greg
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 18:27:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:06 UTC