W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Today's SPARQL WG Agenda

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:52:43 -0500
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1327413163.8292.132.camel@waldron>
Regrets for at least the first half.  Once a month the eGov IG and
SPARQL conflict, on their current schedules.

    -- Sandro


On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 08:37 -0500, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Apologies for the very late agenda. A bit of a miscommunication between 
> us chairs.
> 
> Last week's minutes are at: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-01-17
> 
> Today I'd like to discuss:
> 
> * Test approvals
>    * The implementation report at 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ shows tests that are / 
> are not approved
>    * I'd like to go over this, and propose approving all tests that are 
> passed by both ARQ and RDF::Query.
>    * We can then focus on tests that are failed by one or the other or 
> not run by both.
> 
> * CSV/TSV
>    * A brief mail thread at 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0075.html
>    * We approved test cases in 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-08-16, with a bit of 
> discussion about the difference between the formats (CSV is values only, 
> TSV has full term information)
>    * I'd like to at least discuss this: if I'm the only person 
> uncomfortable with the two formats, then I'll let it go...
> 
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 13:52:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT