W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Publications ready to go (almost)

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 04:03:20 +0100
Message-Id: <647582B0-F3EB-4116-BE4A-B2C4DEB29A41@deri.org>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Here's how far I got checking the documents in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/pub/20120102/ according to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Pub-Process

Unfortunately, I couldn't delete the folders WD-sparql11-update-20120102/ ,  WD-sparql11-query-201120105/ and WD-sparql11-entailment-20120102/ 
(the usual problem about CVS not allowing to move folders... maybe it would be worthwhile if W3C switched to SVN or something else, but well)
Anyways, please just consider the following folders for copying to TR space:

Here the details where we stand:

1) Query

    ... checked and ready to copy to TR from my side (two 403s for some linkse to wikipedia, these should be ok, two broken links to the documents to be published, should be ok) 

   * I removed the line "<p>This document is also available in these non-normative formats: <a href="WD-sparql11-query-20120105.xml">XML</a> and <a href="WD-sparql11-query-20120105-review.html">XHTML with color-coded revision indicators</a>.</p>" 
   since I didn't find these docs on CVS, and thus assumed that this was a left-over from the previous pub.
   * I also removed "<p>Please refer to the <a href="http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/query-errata"><strong>errata</strong></a> for this document, which may
      include some normative corrections.</p>" (No errata link yet, though we need to keep that in mind for the final versions indeed.)

2) Update:
    ... checked and ready to copy to TR from my side (one broken link, to the document to be published itself, should be ok)

3) Entailment:
    ... checked and ready to copy to TR from my side (one broken link, to the document to be published itself, should be ok)

   I added the list of SPARQL documents, as in Update and Query and the same uniform text for the status section (Birte, you may want to propagate that back to the xml)

With that, I am out of steam for today (and can't contribute more tomorrow) and so kindly ask Lee & Sandro to finish publication, i.e. do a final check on both 
 4) Service Description (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/pub/20120102/WD-sparql11-service-description-20120105/) 
 5) Protocol (http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/pub/20120102/WD-sparql11-protocol-20120105/)
(I think Greg has run throught pubrules already, so we should be ok, I hope)

BTW, Don't forget to additionally copy the http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/pub/20120102/shared/ folder which has some css file.

cheers & good night,

p.s.: @Paul one question (@Birte, the same applies to Entailment):
I had some confusion with a link to the local.css files in Update, I realized that the local.css there wasn't necessary, 
so I removed the import directive in the final html. That seems to stem from shared/xmlspec.xsl and I am not 100% clear whether 
we need it (Isn't the shared/local.css enough?), so I left it in at shared/xmlspec.xsl.
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 03:03:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC