W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Possible Service Description change

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:30:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4FE0C52B.9040903@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org

On 19/06/12 15:49, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> In a single update request there may be operations that use
>> USING/USING NAMED and some that do not.  So one operation may use
>> USING/USING NAMED to get a dynamically constructed dataset and the
>> next operation does not use USING* so it can see the results of an
>> earlier operation.
> Interesting. I hadn't considered that. This is where we run up
> against the few SD "features" being under specified, I guess. So do
> you think the current wording is acceptable?

It is acceptable -


"will dereference" -- not sure about "will", it's seems definite that 
will happen, maybe it's a possibility.  But I can't suggest better 
wording, all that I tried seemed worse!

One of:

s/query evaluation/graph pattern evaluation/   (pedantic)
s/query evaluation/query or update evaluation/ (mention update)
s/query evaluation/evaluation/                 (covers any evaluation)


> thanks, .greg
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 18:30:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:06 UTC