- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:49:36 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Jun 19, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > In a single update request there may be operations that use USING/USING NAMED and some that do not. So one operation may use USING/USING NAMED to get a dynamically constructed dataset and the next operation does not use USING* so it can see the results of an earlier operation. Interesting. I hadn't considered that. This is where we run up against the few SD "features" being under specified, I guess. So do you think the current wording is acceptable? thanks, .greg
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 14:50:10 UTC