- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:51:15 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 05/06/12 07:49, Polleres, Axel wrote: > As per last week's minutes, we plan a short telecon checking on actions and try to make make progress where we can, particularly, I suggest to quickly run through http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR through the docs that weren't covered last week. If the editors could check the resp. sections and add any items/open comments they are ware of, that'd help! > > Accordingly: > > 1) ACTION review > 2) Run through http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR > * Update, > * Entailment > * 2 x Result formats > 3) Comments... My question would be whether or not we need to treat those two as official comments: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jun/0001.html (went to several lists at once) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jun/0002.html (already informally answered by Andy) Yes, please clarify - it was not clear as to whether it was a comment on the spec or a discussion point, I leant heavily on: "Clarification please?" and treated it as discussion. It's also SPARQL 1.0 and refers to implementation behaviour but we don't police implementations. Andy > > > Best, > Axel > > -- > Dr. Axel Polleres > Siemens AG Österreich > Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research& Technologies > CT T CEE > > Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 > Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859 > Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com >
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 10:51:46 UTC