- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 09:48:00 +0200
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In order to close off the comments section upto Feb2012, cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments#Last_Call_.28to_Feb_2012.29 I have drafted a response to JP-5, cf. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JP-5 In the course of this, I have added the suggested example to the test suite as http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/property-path/pp37.rq which I'd kindly ask for approval/cross-checking (I haven't yet tested it with a running implementation, but it's the behaviour I assume valid with the new semantics of "*". best, Axel BTW: I found a use case http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/property-path/pp36.rq in that directory, which is not part of the manifest.
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 07:48:26 UTC