RE: Today's Minutes / Publication Plan

> On 25 Apr 2012, at 09:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > Better: add BindingsClause to
> > 
> > [58]  GraphPatternNotTriples
> >   ::=  GroupOrUnionGraphPattern | OptionalGraphPattern | 
> > MinusGraphPattern | GraphGraphPattern | ServiceGraphPattern 
> | Filter | 
> > Bind | BindingsClause

Alright, convinced, thanks ;-)

Axel
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Harris [mailto:steve.harris@garlik.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 April 2012 10:59 AM
> To: Andy Seaborne
> Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Today's Minutes / Publication Plan
> 
> On 25 Apr 2012, at 09:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> ...
> > 
> > Better: add BindingsClause to
> > 
> > [58]  GraphPatternNotTriples
> >   ::=  GroupOrUnionGraphPattern | OptionalGraphPattern | 
> > MinusGraphPattern | GraphGraphPattern | ServiceGraphPattern 
> | Filter | 
> > Bind | BindingsClause
> > 
> > 
> > { ?s ?p ?o BINDINGS ?p ?o { (:p 157) (:q 34.7) }
> > 
> > execution wise - happens after 'extend' (BIND) and before 'filter' 
> > (FILTER)
> > 
> > then its in subqueries and everywhere else.
> 
> This also neatly solves the surprise FILTER interaction, as 
> BINDINGS get joined before FILTER is run, when inline.
> 
> - Steve
> 
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO
> Garlik, a part of Experian
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 
> Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business 
> Park, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England NG80 1ZZ
> 
> 
>