W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2012

RE: references from Overview (was Re: Overview document (ACTION-595))

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:16:16 +0200
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80138CF1CB2E6@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
> suite?"  My answer to that would be Yes, Absolutely, but it 
> should be something a little more friendly than 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html
>

How about adapting that one:
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
as follows:

 1) Explaining how to run the tests in a separate new section
 2) Putting something like
    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/r2
    auto-generated and adapted to the SPARQL1.1 test cases in the appendix.

Best,
Axel 

-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres 
Siemens AG Österreich 
Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies 
CT T CEE 
 
Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 
Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 April 2012 3:11 PM
> To: Polleres, Axel
> Cc: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: references from Overview (was Re: Overview document 
> (ACTION-595))
> 
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 00:43 +0200, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > while I didn't do changes on the overview doc as of yet, 
> I'd like to 
> > highlight things that might need discussion before we can go to LC:
> >  
> > 1)  Reference to:
> > "
> > Using SPARQL1.1 with RDF1.1 - SPARQL1.1 is based on the Resource 
> > Description Framework (RDF) specifications in their 2004 
> version. This 
> > document describes how SPARQL1.1 is to be used with RDF1.1, 
> which is 
> > currently under development. (Note: this is a placeholder at the
> > moment.)
> > "
> >  
> > * Will we progress this document to at least a note?
> 
> Without having thought about this a lot, I suggest we have 
> the Overview just link a web page (maybe 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/sparql11-and-rdf11 or
> 2009/sparql/rdf11) and for now that can redirect to the wiki 
> page, but later if we make it a WG Note, we can switch the 
> redirect to be there.
> 
> > 2) Reference in Section 11
> >  
> > Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language, ed. Dave Beckett and Tim 
> > Berners-Lee, W3C Team Submission 28 March 2011. (See
> > http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/.)
> >  
> > * Can we keep that and change it later on, as Turtle becomes a Rec 
> > from the RDF WG?
> 
> Since there's already a WD, let's use that.  
> http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle
> 
> That will update in place to the REC.
> 
> 
> Also, there's, "@@@Shall this document also link to the test 
> suite?"  My answer to that would be Yes, Absolutely, but it 
> should be something a little more friendly than 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/summary.html
> 
> Maybe we can make a short web page that talks about the test suite and
> then links there.   I'm not sure whether to use a wiki or non wiki URL
> for that.   I guess I'd pick non-wiki.    Maybe 
> 2009/sparql/test-suite.
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 13:16:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:48 GMT