W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2012

RE: Tomorrow's SPARQL meeting at risk

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:53:15 +0200
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80138CF097C42@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
> Axel, are we still waiting on you for Overview? 

Overview is ready to go from my side and had one review from Matt.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0225.html

My resp. mail on that is here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0275.html
and had some questions to the group on references.

It would be good if these were (at least briefly discussed) in the light of whether 
there's anything that keeps the doc from going to LC, particularly the refernces to Turtle and to the 
"Using SPARQL1.1 with RDF1.1" document.

If nobody thinks these are showstoppers, from my side we can go to LC, even without a second review.

>  And do you still want
> CSV and GSP to wait for Overview?    (please correct me if I'm mistaken
> in my memory of those dependencies.)

Not necessarily, also fine to publish these two now and wait with Overview until Query is ready.

Axel


 
-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres 
Siemens AG Ísterreich 
Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies 
CT T CEE 
 
Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 
Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org] 
> Sent: Monday, 23 April 2012 8:44 PM
> To: Lee Feigenbaum
> Cc: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: Re: Tomorrow's SPARQL meeting at risk
> 
> On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:29 -0400, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> > Unfortunately, both Axel and I once again have unavoidable 
> conflicts 
> > tomorrow.
> > 
> > Is anyone willing to chair?
> 
> I'm happy to chair (and I wont be in the car this time!).  
> I'm also happy to have someone else do it who is more 
> involved day-to-day with
> the technology.   If that's you, speak up.
> 
> > The topics that seemingly need discussion are:
> > 
> > * Most recent comments
> >    * BINDINGS
> >    * Recent prop path comments from William Waites and Wim 
> Martens - I 
> > don't think there's anything here that's new, but we should 
> make sure
> > 
> > * Updating test cases to reflect new property path semantics
> > 
> > * Identifying and plugging gaps in test suites
> > 
> > * Implementation progress on test suites
> 
> Is there a starting point/overview for our test suite now?  I 
> haven't paid much attention to it.
> 
> > 
> > We still need to publish documents (badly), but that seems 
> to not be 
> > happening as long as Axel and I are snowed under.
> 
> Axel, are we still waiting on you for Overview?  And do you still want
> CSV and GSP to wait for Overview?    (please correct me if 
> I'm mistaken
> in my memory of those dependencies.)
> 
>       -- Sandro
> 
> > 
> > Lee
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 18:53:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:48 GMT