W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Question on syncing entailment regimes conditions between Query and Entailment docs

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:27:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CABt65OfOPJR-yVxjh_x=4QWV+kx1UP_gVxhkjbz3PgZqbM60=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
>>> So, overall, I think this condition should read, in both documents:
>>> "The scoping graph, SG, corresponding to any E-consistent active graph AG
>>> is uniquely specified up to<a
>>> href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-graph-equality">RDF graph
>>> equivalence</a>  and is E-equivalent to AG."
> I don't see this text in the query doc.  Having made the first change to
> query, is that enough?

The documents somehow got out of sync here. Query still has:
1. For any E-consistent active graph AG, the entailment regime E
uniquely specifies a scoping graph SG that is E-equivalent to AG.
but in the Ent. Regimes doc we changed this to
1. The scoping graph, SG, corresponding to any consistent active graph
AG is uniquely specified up to RDF graph equivalence and is
E-equivalent to AG.

I believe we decided this at the last F2F, but not sure. We definitely
decided at some point to have " uniquely specified up to RDF graph
equivalence" in there.


>        Andy
>>> Note: I also suggest adding a link to RDF Graph equivalence, in order to
>>> clarify that this means simple equivalence.
>>> cheers,
>>> Axel
>>> --
>>> Dr. Axel Polleres
>>> url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: AxelPolleres

Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 17:30:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC