W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: please wait on Graphstore Protocol

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:08:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4EE6351C.9010207@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
See also:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jun/0000.html

and the use of the Location header:

http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/#http-post

when the request URI identifies the underlying Graph Store.

	Andy

On 12/12/11 16:27, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 16:10 +0100, Axel Polleres wrote:
>> Dear Chime, Dear Andy,
>>
>> Apart from additional regrets from myself, can you please make sure to update us about the status of your documents?
>>
>> Are we in a position to vote on publications already?
>> If not what is missing and is there anything the group can contribute to get the docs to vote by next week?
>
> Unfortunately, we're not quite ready for Last Call on Graphstore
> Protocol.  I started to surface some issues in my review, and they came
> up again much more strongly at last week's Enterprise Linked Data
> Workshop.   At one level the problem is that the document could stand
> on its own, without any reference to SPARQL, but the users who want
> that will have a hard time finding and understand it because of all the
> SPARQL trappings.   At another level, this design may conflict with
> some users doing just that.  For example:
>
>          Basic Profile Resources are created by HTTP POST (or PUT) to an
>          existing resource, deleted by HTTP DELETE, updated by HTTP PUT
>          or PATCH, and "fetched" using HTTP GET.
>
>          --
>          http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/basic-profile-linked-data/index.html
>
> I think that conflicts with our POST-to-Graph=APPEND rule.  I think we
> need to sort this out before Last Call.  It's pretty much my top
> priority -- I hope to have a proposal in the next day or two.
>
>      -- Sandro
>
>> thanks a lot,
>> Axel
>>
>> On 12 Dec 2011, at 16:07, Chime Ogbuji wrote:
>>
>>> I will have to give my regrets for this teleconference
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chime Ogbuji
>>> Sent with Sparrow
>>> On Monday, December 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>> I'm "at risk" for this week's telecon.
>>>>
>>>>   Andy
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 17:11:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT