- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:08:44 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jun/0000.html and the use of the Location header: http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/#http-post when the request URI identifies the underlying Graph Store. Andy On 12/12/11 16:27, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 16:10 +0100, Axel Polleres wrote: >> Dear Chime, Dear Andy, >> >> Apart from additional regrets from myself, can you please make sure to update us about the status of your documents? >> >> Are we in a position to vote on publications already? >> If not what is missing and is there anything the group can contribute to get the docs to vote by next week? > > Unfortunately, we're not quite ready for Last Call on Graphstore > Protocol. I started to surface some issues in my review, and they came > up again much more strongly at last week's Enterprise Linked Data > Workshop. At one level the problem is that the document could stand > on its own, without any reference to SPARQL, but the users who want > that will have a hard time finding and understand it because of all the > SPARQL trappings. At another level, this design may conflict with > some users doing just that. For example: > > Basic Profile Resources are created by HTTP POST (or PUT) to an > existing resource, deleted by HTTP DELETE, updated by HTTP PUT > or PATCH, and "fetched" using HTTP GET. > > -- > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/basic-profile-linked-data/index.html > > I think that conflicts with our POST-to-Graph=APPEND rule. I think we > need to sort this out before Last Call. It's pretty much my top > priority -- I hope to have a proposal in the next day or two. > > -- Sandro > >> thanks a lot, >> Axel >> >> On 12 Dec 2011, at 16:07, Chime Ogbuji wrote: >> >>> I will have to give my regrets for this teleconference >>> >>> -- >>> Chime Ogbuji >>> Sent with Sparrow >>> On Monday, December 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>>> I'm "at risk" for this week's telecon. >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 12 December 2011 17:11:44 UTC