W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Query review, part 2 (ACTION-546)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:12:19 +0000
Message-ID: <4EE20933.2070601@epimorphics.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


On 09/12/11 11:24, Steve Harris wrote:
> @@Andy
> Do we have an ancestor type for bNodes/literals/URIs? Should I just omit the return type?

We do, RDF does not :-)

RDF term, or just "term"

See e.g.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#func-sameTerm

	Andy
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 13:12:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT