W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Review of Graph Store Protocol (action 564)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:15:37 +0000
Message-ID: <4ED8C169.3030000@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> == Comment 10
> == section 5.4
 > = Multipart.
> Make this 5.4.1 or place as subsection earlier because it applies to
> PUT as well, presumably.

== Comment 13
= Related to comment 10

Does the discussion about auto-creation of a graph name when POSTing to 
the dataset URI, also apply to PUT?

This is another case where pulling the text out into it's own subsection 
then mentioning from POTS and PUT would be better.

Generally, PUT and POST are the same except PUT replaces and POST 
appends so in this case both should allocate a new named graph.

What happens with multipart?  One graph, all content or severalnew named 
graphs?  I'd expect the latter but I think the doc needs to say so.

Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 12:16:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC