W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:18:22 -0500
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7E80993D-6900-425B-A865-2202E1EF90D1@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>

On Nov 30, 2011, at 5:58 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:

>> So it sounds like (given this and Greg's report [1]), we might well be
>> able to skip CR, except for ER, but we might not want to, because we
>> want to improve our test suite and give the community a chance to
>> participate in the before-REC process.
> </chair> At the time being, I tend to agree with the latter, ie. I'd  rather keep 
> at least a short CR phase, given that we manage to get our core specs out by Christmas.
> <chair>
> Any more opinions on that one?

I tend to agree, while very much hoping that CR is short. From the sound of things, though, I suspect that between ARQ, RDF::Query, rasqal, and Sesame, there's probably good coverage of at least Query, Update, and Protocol. The only document that I'm concerned about is entailment, but that could just be because I'm not as familiar with systems doing entailment.

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 01:19:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC