Re: query review, part 1 (ACTION-546)

On 2011-11-24, at 15:52, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 24/11/11 15:46, Steve Harris wrote:
>> 
>> On 24 Nov 2011, at 13:36, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>>>> On 22/11/11 10:38, Steve Harris wrote:
>>>>>> Great, thanks Greg.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some easy fixes inline. Some of the others I'm either not swapped in on, or will need discussion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Which? (I don't see any)
>>>> 
>>>> Which don't you see?
>>> 
>>> I'm not clear which ones are ones you need to swap in or you think need discussion.  esp the "discussion" bit.
>> 
>> Ah, I see - well if I had an answer but didn't mark it fixed I think it needs discussion, if I skipped it then I'm not swapped in.
> 
> I've done everything that you hadn't commented on.  I'm not completely clear which, if any, points you replied to but you don't consider fixed yet.  Can I leave that to you to track those?  At least, there shouldn't be very many (or I'm missing something quite important).

I believe it's all addressed.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 13:53:31 UTC