Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1 Protocol (part 1 - up to end of section2)

On 17/11/11 14:55, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> ** Section 2.2.3
>>
>> What about "WITH"?
>
> Huh. This seems like old text to me. Didn't we also change the name of
> these parameters? Damn. I'm going to need to revisit our past
> discussions to see what happened to the proper text here.

The text in the document does not reflect:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0223.html

 Andy

Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 10:00:08 UTC