W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Comment responses for MS-[2-7]

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:04:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CABt65OdWw6DZfRohEhFPN_62LAziFKknxSzvr8ShqszmfS60RA@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all,

after today's teleconf, I've spend some time to finish the replies to
Michael's comments. I would be grateful if you could support the
response, so that I can mail out the replies. The biggest change is
from MS-6 as detailed below.

Birte

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-2
- Comment about higher order semantics, reply that higher order
reasoning is not required.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-3
- Comment that we should have different restriction for the queried
graph and the pattern, which we have in fact. A clearer distinction is
not foreseen by the BGP extension point condition.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-4
- Comment that error handling should be weakend to SHOULD, but I want
to stay consistent with SPARQL Query, so left as is. Only for OWL
Direct Semantics the exception that triples that violate OWL DL
constraints can be omitted is dropped.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-5
- Suggestion that inconsistent graphs should not be handled in the
spec, but that is required by the BGP matching extension point
conditions.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-6
- D-Entailment has no fixed datatype map, so if we have one, it's not
D-entailment. Since also Antoine Zimmermann was not too happy with the
datatype map, I now dropped that. Systems have to specify, e.g., in
their documentation, what datatype map they use, but D-entailment no
longer prescribes a fixed datatype map.

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-7
Clarification of an example for which I had a question in an editorial
note. Example is anyway simplified now.



-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm                         Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence                      Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                                       Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                                             birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 16:05:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT