- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:51:35 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 07/10/11 14:54, Steve Harris wrote: > There's a response at > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JB-6 > > To help paragraph 2 of my response, I'm planning to add some text to > the query doc (probably near the start of 17.4 Operator and Function > Definitions) along the lines of: > “It should be notated that any function or operator that is specified > to return an error under some conditions is a valid extension point. > That is, any implementation my return a non-error value in these > error cases, and still be compliant with this recommendation.” s/notated/noted/ s/my/may/ s/any/an/ (style) s/compliant/conformant/ > > Any thoughts? I would add it in "17.6 Extensible Value Testing" and possibly put one sentence saying "see 17.6" in 17.4 Andy
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2011 12:52:15 UTC