W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: SPARQL cryptographic hash algorithms

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:58:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4E84878F.9050102@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


On 29/09/11 15:01, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> For ACTION-536 I asked W3C's security lead, Thomas Roessler, which hash
> algorithms we should use and he agreed with:
> XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core2/#sec-MessageDigests
>
> which, in the current WD says SHA-1 (for backward compatibility),
> SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512.
>
> Including all four is one or two more than the commenter wants, but
> seems warranted in this case, I think.
>
>     -- Sandro

Sandro : thanks for asking Thomas.

I like the idea of adopting this set because there is a reason (and they 
have URIs).

	Andy
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2011 14:59:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT