Re: SPARQL cryptographic hash algorithms

On 29/09/11 15:01, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> For ACTION-536 I asked W3C's security lead, Thomas Roessler, which hash
> algorithms we should use and he agreed with:
> XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core2/#sec-MessageDigests
>
> which, in the current WD says SHA-1 (for backward compatibility),
> SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512.
>
> Including all four is one or two more than the commenter wants, but
> seems warranted in this case, I think.
>
>     -- Sandro

Sandro : thanks for asking Thomas.

I like the idea of adopting this set because there is a reason (and they 
have URIs).

	Andy