W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Process question on "Errata"

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:38:56 +0200
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <012EA0F5-E828-4864-9C23-D8BD8E3C5C11@deri.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Hi Sandro,

In the last TC (Action-503,ACTION-504) we had a discussion about the "Errata" for the XML Result format.

As far as I understand the process [1], we mostly need to just incorporate the relevant points from 
  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQL_Errata#SPARQL_XML_Results
into 
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/XMLres-errata
and then approve the Errata changes in the group, to be published.

However, there's a small tricky part here:

 In fact, one of the Errata affects the published schema files:
Can we just change those in-place? i.e., can we overwrite some (non-spec) files in the rec space?

Thanks for clarification,

Axel

p.s.: this completes ACTION-503.

1. http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#errata
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 07:39:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT