W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: fed review

From: Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:18:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4E26E3BD.6090904@oracle.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I would be in favor of removing SERVICE VAR. I was a bit uncomfortable with it as well.

- Matt

On 7/20/2011 10:14 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 2011-07-20, at 03:57, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>> So, the possible solutions are:
>>>   - For the SERVICE VAR semantics
>>>     - add a new operation that could allow the evaluation (operation
>>> which wouldn't be bottom-up)
>>>     - define its whole semantics in a new way
>>>   - For the boundedness restriction
>>>    - specify all cases: it may take a bit long
>>>    - remove it? I do not think this is a good idea, how do we specify
>>> then that a variable is bound (which is needed for the evaluation
>>> semantics of SERVICE VAR)?
>>> something missing? any other option?
>> As someone who was a bit uncomfortable including it in the first place, I'll add another, dramatic option: remove SERVICE VAR from the specification altogether.
> That sounds like a good, pragmatic solution, but it would require a second Last Call, no?
> - Steve
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 14:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC