W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Update comment

From: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:20:04 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinCxnT51nJxZ8Q0jJW8fpGW_3fLC3kEB0BB2m_E@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2011, at 22:14, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>> On 23/03/11 21:53, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>> The SPARQL query spec only specifies an indirect relationship between
>>> graph name and contents for FROM and FROM NAMED, right?. USING should
>>> be the same thing -- I don't think I understand the problem?
>>> Lee
>> It's not the indirect relationship involved FROM NAMED (query sec 13.2.2).  Let's just talk about FROM.
>> The problem is that FROM typically cause a graph to be read form the web (yes - not in Anzo or Mulgara, but that's unusual).
> Also not in 3/4/5store, FWIW.
>> The update spec says USING is identical to FROM (it uses the word "identical").
> Right, that's not my recollection if how it was supposed to work.

My recollection was that it was just a replacement, hence the word "identical".

I can find individual meeting minutes, but is there some way to search
all of them? I'd like to find the discussion on this. I know that my
point of view was simply to replace the word FROM since it was
confusing. If another semantics was suggested, then I missed it at the

Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 15:20:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:03 UTC