Re: draft response JB-5

I made a few small wording changes. This reply looks good to be to send out.

thanks, Andy.

Lee

On 3/21/2011 8:22 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Original message:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Mar/0004.html
>
>
> Draft response:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JB-5
>
>
> Essentially, there is an addition fact that a human reading the example
> might naturally make but is not required of a minimal SPARQL 1.0 processor.
>
> Andy
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 12:55:12 UTC