- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:00:21 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 14/03/11 06:03, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > In the wake of our discussion last week, the lack of subsequent > discussion, and our time and experience constraints, I plan to propose > on Tuesday that the SPARQL 1.1 service description cover the SPARQL > Protocol _only_, and that it not discuss graph stores or the dataset > protocol at all. Specifically: > > PROPOSED: The SPARQL 1.1 Service Description describes endpoints that > implement the SPARQL 1.1 Protocol; it does not describe URIs that > respond to the SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol. +1 : This looks to be the best way forward. It also avoids any interactions from future RDF-WG graphs work that might affect the right thing to return from a dataset protocol URI (description or content). Andy > > Please consider this email a "last call" on this topic -- if you have an > alternative proposal, now would be a good time to share it. > > Even if we do resolve this, we probably need to clarify the relationship > between Graph Stores and Datasets more, as Chime pointed out last week. > > Lee
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 12:01:05 UTC