W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Executing the decision on blank bodes in DELETE

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:02:19 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikc+RLVfyJ5R5ua-u97c5TUWuZtmC8PHhhREHE-@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Makes sense to me to ban them here. They're completely useless, and
were only kept in to keep the grammar simpler.

Paul

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
> If we are banning blank node syntax in DELETE templates and DELETE WHERE,
> then should we also ban them in DELETE DATA?
>
> 3.1.2 DELETE DATA says:
>
> [[
> Since blank node labels are only unique within each specific context, there
> is no way to describe a blank node in the graph_triples such that it will
> match existing data.
> ]]
>        Andy
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 21:02:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT