W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:30:05 -0500
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <828AF48C-CE7A-410D-95FF-3DD004817B14@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
On Mar 1, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Andy Seaborne
> <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>> ..snip..
>> Something that might need describing is whether the service providing the
>> RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol supports direct or indirect, or both, naming.
> 
> Perhaps, the following specific sd:Features?:
> - sd:DirectGraphIdentification
> - sd:IndirectGraphIdentification
> 
> i.e.:
> 
> <> a sd:Service;
>     sd:defaultDatasetDescription </dataset> .
>     sd:feature sd:DirectGraphIdentification, sd:IndirectGraphIdentification .
> 
> </dataset> a sd:RESTDataset

I don't think this is right. Direct- and Indirect-graph identification aren't features of a sd:Service, because a sd:Service is an instance of the SPARQL Protocol (not the Dataset Protocol).

.greg
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 22:30:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT