W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Service or graph store naming.

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:44:23 -0500
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <93C3F0E8-B0E5-41F0-9D4D-7B8BD7B02FDF@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

>> What I'm suggesting is that this case doesn't seem inconsistent with the suggested wording to me:
>> " The RDF content returned from dereferencing a service URL<U>  MUST include one triple matching: ?service sd:url<U>  ."
> "MUST include one" might imply "and only one"
> What about?
> "MUST include at least one"

I *knew* you were going to suggest that! :)

I was hesitant to do that because I would like the normal case to be one. But yes, that is what technically what I'm proposing. Would that text be acceptable to you?

Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 15:44:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:03 UTC