W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:46:36 -0500
Message-ID: <4D6C4FFC.5000302@thefigtrees.net>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
My personal feeling is that it would be _very_ confusing to allow the 
same bnode label in two BGPs but have it refer to distinct blank nodes. 
You'd have a situation where sometimes (within the same BGP) two 
mentions of _:a would be the same and other times (in two BGPs, perhaps 
separated by BIND or something like that)  they wouldn't.

Please let me know if anyone feels otherwise. If there appears to be 
silence / consensus, then I will draft a response to Kjetil.

Lee

On 2/28/2011 8:15 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in order to answer comment KK-7
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jan/0009.html
>
> I am pretty sure that this has been discussed in depth and there is some DAWG1-discussion
> about this issue somewhere back in the archives... If anybody from our DAWG1 members
> feels like pointing me to it, I'd be grateful!
>
> Axel
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 01:47:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT