W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol"

From: Nicholas Humfrey <nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:58:03 +0000
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C984397B.36546%nicholas.humfrey@bbc.co.uk>
On 18/02/2011 12:44, "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:

> On 15/02/11 13:50, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:
>> 4) I was wondering if it would be helpful to use 'defacto' URLs in the
>> examples. Are there actually any graph store implementations using the URLs
>> shown in the example? I think it would be helpful if the examples worked on
>> at least one graph store implementation.
> I don't think we should "bless" one implementation by using it as the
> examples, if that is your suggestion.  We don't have a formal
> "reference" implementation.

That was my suggestion. My reason for suggesting it, we just to have 'real
world' examples which are familiar when reading the specification. It would
also give a pattern for anyone implementing the specification to follow.

But I am happy to accept that not everyone thinks it is a good idea :)


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
Received on Friday, 18 February 2011 14:58:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:03 UTC