W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:05:25 -0500
Message-ID: <4D5DE1F5.7060909@thefigtrees.net>
To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
CC: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
On 2/17/2011 11:29 AM, Paul Gearon wrote:
>> I'm not inclined to revisit this decision at this point in time. Please let
>> me know if you see something significantly new and would like the working
>> group to consider it.
> Well it does appear that the issues were considered. I suppose I'm not
> going to create a roadblock for the working group at this late stage,
> but I think it's a bad idea. This email can serve as a record that I
> strongly object to this resolution.

Hi Paul,

Could you please clarify if you'd like this to be treated as a formal 
objection when the update document transitions to CR?

Received on Friday, 18 February 2011 03:06:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:03 UTC