W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

ISSUE-33

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:04:52 +0000
Message-Id: <4781EB91-E04B-4D01-AE0C-40B9B1D493CD@deri.org>
Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Lee, all,

short after Lee dropped out in today's call, we had discussed briefly what to do with ISSUE-33

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/33
"ISSUE-33: Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP  errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL?"


Given the decision to drop WSDL, can we 
a) drop ISSUE-33, or 
b) do we need to reword it instead?

if b) any concrete suggestions for rewording?

Discussion, Opinons welcome!

Thanks,
Axel
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:05:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT