W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:42:17 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Message-Id: <3D6D84B8-6602-4CDF-B2C1-18DB4FE04408@garlik.com>
To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Birte,

Thanks for the review.

These changes all seemed like an improvement to me, so I've added them in revision 1.197

Thanks,
   Steve

On 2011-02-11, at 12:36, Birte Glimm wrote:
...
> 
> 12 Subqueries, after the data for the first example:
> "Return a name (the one with the lowest sort order) from all the
> people that know Alice and have a name."
> Isn't the query rather asking for people that Alice knows? How about:
> "Return a name (the one with the lowest sort order) for all the
> people that Alice knows and who have a name."
> 
> at the end of the example:
> Subqueries require one additional algebra operator, ToMultiset, which
> takes *l*ists and returns *m*ultisets.
> I don't see a reason to put list and multiset in upper case since
> these terms do not refer to any function in this context.
> 
> at the end of the section:
> Only variables projected by the Project function are visible to
> operations outside the ToMultiset call.
> <code>ToMultiset</code> (for consistency)
...

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 12:42:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT