W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Documents [was: Re: ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1)]

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:41:15 +0000
Message-ID: <4D58F8BB.6020001@epimorphics.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> 3) We should have this  either in all or none of our documents:

+1

> "The documents produced by this Working Group are:
>
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Query
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions (this document)
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Update
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Protocol for RDF
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Service Description
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths
>      * SPARQL 1.1 Conformance Tests
> "

Query has (with links in the HTML):

[[
The set of SPARQL documents comprises:

     * SPARQL 1.1 Query (this document)
     * SPARQL 1.1 Update
     * SPARQL 1.1 Protocol for RDF
     * SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol
     * SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes
     * SPARQL 1.1 Service Description
     * SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions
     * SPARQL 1.1 Conformance Tests
     * SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format
     * SPARQL Query Results XML Format
]]

which:
1/ includes JSON results
2/ includes XML results even though we're not publishing that this time 
round.
3/ includes conformance even though it's not a REC track document (is it?)

Last time (DAWG) didn't mention the tests and then people asked where 
were the tests.  One issue might be that it's not formally frozen in anyway.

	Andy
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 09:41:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT