W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Draft response to GK-1

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:17:00 +0000
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E9597B0E-CFBF-4CA5-A7F3-BBFEDEF1457C@deri.org>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Hi steve,

On 8 Feb 2011, at 16:31, Steve Harris wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:GK-1

corrected some typos there, apart from that looks fine.
> 
> GK-2 is a comment saying that point 2 of GK-1 can be ignored, so I don't think it requires an official response!

added "see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0001.html." to make that clear.

> He raises a reasonable point about the interaction of ORDER BY, http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#convertSolMod could be construed as meaning that ORDER is preserved in aggregate operations, though the algebra does say it's operations on multisets.

Is this something that needs to be discussed? Could an alternative behaviour to the current one be achieved with reasonable effort and the time/resources we still have?

best,
Axel

> 
> - Steve
> 
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 14 February 2011 09:17:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT