Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367)

On 1 Feb 2011, at 15:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> Unless you're trying to make a point that missed me,
> the file extension
> should be .srj.

...thanks, I had missed that! Fixed in 
  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html 
and also in 
  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/

Apart from that, any further comments anyone?

thanks,
Axel

> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/#mediaType
> 
> (the SPARQL 1.0 uses this BTW)
> 
>         Andy
> 
> On 01/02/11 13:21, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > 4 "JSON result format" test cases can be found under
> >
> >     http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/
> >
> > In this context, I also looked into
> >       http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
> > to see what I need to adapt for tests of the SPARQL results format...
> > We have - actually - not really  defined testing of the results format
> > per se, but basically say that SELECT and ASK queries pass, if the result
> > is equivalent after encoding results into RDF:
> >
> >    "A SPARQL implementation passes a query evaluation test if the graph produced by evaluating the query against the RDF dataset (and encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary) is equivalent [RDF-CONCEPTS] to the graph named in the result (after encoding in the DAWG result set vocabulary, if necessary)."
> >
> > We haven't specified in detail how the  conversion to DAWG result set vocabulary works in sparql/docs/tests/result-set.n3
> > Anyways, I think that's a minor issue, or does anyone think we need to define the mapping for each result format? (I think/hope it is quite obvious)
> >
> > So far, I just added some lines allowing the JSON results format, under the name/short-name suggested by Andy [1] in the test case README.html
> > Opinions welcome!
> >
> > best,
> > Axel
> >
> > 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JanMar/0140.html
>