W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests

From: Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:41:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4D3EE123.2040803@oracle.com>
To: W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

I have reviewed the property path tests. We need tests for {m,n}, {,n}, ? and () for precedence, and I think we need more tests for combinations of property path constructs.

I have disagreements with some of the answers given in the current tests.

1) pp15 -- I don't see why we are returning results on an empty dataset.
2) pp16 -- I don't understand why the path d --> e --> f --> e is included.
3) pp25 -- I don't understand why the path a --> c --> c is included.

For pp16 and pp25, these paths repeat a node (i.e. contain a cycle). I thought we were using a node marking algorithm to prevent cycles.

Received on Tuesday, 25 January 2011 14:42:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:03 UTC