- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 17:05:32 +0000
- To: "Carlos Buil Aranda" <cbuil@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Just to make clear, what I suggested is to not necessarily have a full SPARQL endpoint up, but just some pre-canned responses to
precanned HTTP requests for the test cases. (that would be even simpler than guaranteeing to maintain and run a fully-fledged
SPARQL endpoint that can be used for evaluating the test cases on one of W3C's servers)
Opinions?
Axel
On 20 Jan 2011, at 17:01, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
> For me that works, I already have some test endpoints with dummy data
> for these purposes. It would be easy to place that data in SPARQL endpoints.
>
> Carlos
>
> On 20/01/2011 10:48, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > Hi Carlos, Sandro,
> >
> > I am a bit lost with that...
> > I remember we had some discussion internally about that, e.g. providing a dedicated "endpoint" responding to specific queries in a certain way...
> > That could be done by providing some hard-coded "dummy" endpoint that responds to a couple of specific HTTP encoded SPARQL queries which we use in the test cases with the respective SPARQL-result.
> >
> > If we had that, I believe, we wouldn't need to specify any extra vocabulary for the test cases for fed query, the only thing is to get some URIs like e.g.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/endpoint1?query=SELECT+*+WHERE+{%3FS+%3FP+%3FO+}
> >
> > to serve some specified results. Would that do?
> >
> > Axel
>
>
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 17:06:06 UTC