- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:22:27 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I think that's a reasonable response. - Steve On 2011-06-14, at 10:38, Andy Seaborne wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:SC-3 > > This conversion is going round in circles. Sebastián is just reiterating a previous point without new information. There is no proposal here, nor in the previous messages. It is simply a matter that he would have preferred a different design where property paths are not translated to expansions as BGPs. > > All we can really do is say "we have read your comments but feel that > the current approach is the right one". > > If this goes round yet again without making progress, I suggest we > record it as dissent. We aren't going to make any more progress on the > comments list. > > Andy > > (ignore the one in the unsolicited mail trap - wrong sending address) > -- Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 11:23:08 UTC