W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: json result format --> new charter !?

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:59:39 +0100
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5518A161-D94A-4E6E-8918-DB5348385F5F@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On 2011-05-30, at 12:44, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> Sandro,
> 
> Thanks for doing this - the diff is especially useful.
> 
> Do we need to add the Overview document to the list of documents?  if it's REC-track, then adding it for completeness would be safest.
> 
> On 30/05/11 08:32, Steve Harris wrote:
>> Overall seems good to me, but I'd suggest a couple of changes:
>> 
>> In light of the :s :p 18. change I'd propose to weaken the back compat requirement. Maybe something like "...excepting the case of errata", or so.
> 
> Maybe add that alignment between Turtle (submission?) and SPARQL is of importance.  I think this then gives us latitude to align escape processing and 18.  I don't think "18." can be kept under errata as the change is being made to Turtle and SPARQL so it can't be simply classed as errata ("we really meant ...").

Yeah, I like that better.
...
> Suggestion:
> """
> The working group will consider alignment of syntax with the areas of overlay with Turtle [link-submission] where it causes minimal change.
> """

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Monday, 30 May 2011 19:00:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT