W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: description of WITH (ACTION-454 DONE)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:34:22 +0100
Message-ID: <4DC0207E.6050504@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
(email for process tracking)

On 03/05/11 16:23, Paul Gearon wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Andy Seaborne
> <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>  wrote:
> <snip/>
>
>>> more USING NAMED clauses, then the dataset will include a
>>> default graph specified by the WITH clause, if present, or an empty
>>> graph otherwise.
>>
>> To be consistent with FROM/FROM NAMED then any use of USING should be a
>> complete dataset description so no USING means empty default graph
>> regardless of WITH.
>>
>> Therefore I suggest:
>>
>> [[
>> If there is no USING clause, but there is
>> one of more USING NAMED clauses, then the dataset will include a
>> default graph which is an empty graph.
>> ]]
>
> I agree with this change. I had an impression that WITH would be
> changing the default graph in this case, which I didn't like but was
> trying to preserve. I am pleased to find I was mistaken.
>
> Paul
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 15:34:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT