W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Service description spec - service name

From: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuil@fi.upm.es>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:03:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4D9ADAE0.3030809@fi.upm.es>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
  Hi Greg,

I agree with your answer to the RS-1 email. In particular, regarding the 
alignment between the terminology of the service description and 
federation documents, I will rename from service name to a more suitable 
naming convention in the Fed document.


On 01/04/2011 18:38, Gregory Williams wrote:
> I've started to draft a response to Robert Scanlon on his comments about the service description document:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RS-1
> I think most of his concerns are based on a misunderstanding between the service (possibly an IRI) and the service URL (the place you access the service as defined by the sparql protocol).
> The one issue the comment raises that needs addressing is the terminology difference between the SD and Fed documents. The SD document refers to a "service URL" while the fed document (in discussing what goes inside the<>  of a SERVICE pattern) refers to a "service name". I notice that the current Protocol draft defines a "SPARQL endpoint" as "The URI at which a SPARQL Protocol service listens for requests from SPARQL Protocol clients." Maybe the SD (and fed) document should s/service URL/service URI/?
> Thoughts?
> thanks,
> .greg
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 09:03:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC