W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Resolution for ISSUE-37

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:04:22 +0100
Cc: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B2CA2AC7-702F-4BF3-AF45-D1469D55F77F@garlik.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
On 2010-09-29, at 18:55, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> On 9/29/2010 1:42 PM, Alexandre Passant wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm checking current issues in the Update doc, and see that ISSUE-37 is closed.
>> 
>> RESOLVED: close ISSUE-37 by adding a note to Update mentioning possible feedback effects
>> +
>> ACTION: paul to add a note on possible feedback effects of federated queries in update (ACTION-289)
>> 
>> Do Paul or anyone remind what we meant by "feedback effects" here ?
>> Seems to relate to atomicity ?
> 
> The use case in question involved using SERVICE in the WHERE clause of an update operation, I believe.

That's correct. Different levels of atomicity could lead different stores to return different results.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 07:05:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:43 GMT