W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:38:40 +0100
Message-ID: <4C98D180.7000203@epimorphics.com>
To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 20/09/10 20:29, Birte Glimm wrote:
> We could also say that within the document an entailment regimes is
> actually understood as taking an entailment relation and define
> condiions on its use so that the SPARQL conditions on extensions are
> met.

I think that something along those lines would be a good idea.  When the 
terminology was deep inside the query spec, the somewhat technical 
definition was OK, but it's now part of a document title so a more 
accessible definition would be better.

Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 15:39:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:01 UTC