- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:38:40 +0100
- To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 20/09/10 20:29, Birte Glimm wrote: > We could also say that within the document an entailment regimes is > actually understood as taking an entailment relation and define > condiions on its use so that the SPARQL conditions on extensions are > met. I think that something along those lines would be a good idea. When the terminology was deep inside the query spec, the somewhat technical definition was OK, but it's now part of a document title so a more accessible definition would be better. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 15:39:19 UTC