- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:59:12 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> Other possible agenda items: (hidden in 2010JulSep/0224) Thanks Andy for the input! > * An overview page giving details of the documents? > Is this a REC track document? Something else? I quickly drafted some short overview document stub [1] to see whether this is what we need... It's only drafted on the wiki for the moment... before I put it in spec style/add it to CVS, let's agree on the general direction. My plan would be to have a mini-example illustrating what you find in each spec document and what you can do with the spec. 1. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Overview-Document > * SPARQL 1.1 Common Functions Library > Status? Are we doing it? Document? > > * should move to promote the JSON format as a REC > and canonicalise its name? > Good points as well, I would prefer to move them to next time, though. Thanks! Axel
Received on Monday, 23 August 2010 23:59:48 UTC