- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:52:49 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all, we want to discusss mainly two things tomorrow: - response to Tim's comments (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Aug/0004.html) please check Chime's mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0227.html\ - How do we proceed with ISSUEs likely to be postponed: The "limit per resource" discussion [1] or syntax shortcuts for query [2] are I think only two examples of that. While I don't want to spend telecon time on discussing those issues, acknowledging that we're probably better off to leave them for a potential future WG, we should discuss briefly how we will process with "leftovers" for a future WG, see DAWG's postponed issues [3]. Among those might also fall the features which didn't make it this round detailed agenda will follow later this evening, Axel 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0194.html 2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JulSep/0193.html 3. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 15:53:20 UTC