- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:03:37 -0400
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>,"public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
"Steve Harris" <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
>We've have a few problems with people googling for "sparql update", finding the member submission from 2008, and assuming that's the right syntax.
>
>Is there any way to put a note, or pointer to look at the current drafts? I would imagine more people now implement the drafts.
There are two approaches to this: making the "latest version" url serve up our current WG drafts, or have a note like on the OWL 1 RECs pointing to OWL 2. I lean toward the latter option. Anyone care to suggest wording for such a note, and I'll propose it to the people in charge of pubs...? It'd be nice to have wording that won't need to be changed as our drafts mature.
-- Sandro
>Regards,
> Steve
>
>--
>Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>+44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/
>Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>
>
>
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Received on Saturday, 14 August 2010 14:03:35 UTC