W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: updated answer draft to comment PA-1, please check.

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:36:48 +0100
Cc: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@talis.com>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5D8CB67C-B6F3-4FB9-9ABA-B215437B2F73@deri.org>
To: "Passant, Alexandre" <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
Alex, Andy updated the prefixes and the footnote, will send tomorrow morning unless other objections in between...

Thanks,
Axel
On 20 Jul 2010, at 14:42, Passant, Alexandre wrote:

> I guess that <skos:prefLabel> (and related URIs using the same style) should be skos:prefLabel
> 
> Alex.
> 
> On 20 Jul 2010, at 14:41, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> 
> > No footnote for [1] otherwise it's OK.
> >
> >       Andy
> >
> > On 20/07/2010 1:12 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >> updated...
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PA-1
> >>
> >> better?
> >>
> >> Axel
> >>
> >> On 20 Jul 2010, at 11:43, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 20/07/2010 11:24 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I updated answer draft to coment PA-1, please check at
> >>>>
> >>>>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PA-1
> >>>
> >>> I think this misses the point behind the comment.  The syntax issues are
> >>> incidental to the request for something to create legal IRIs.
> >>>
> >>> 1/ Pointing to fn:encode-for-uri seems to get to the heart of the issue
> >>> as I read the original comment.
> >>>
> >>> 2/ fn:concat and fn:encode-for-uri are on the list of proposed functions
> >>> for the standard function library [1] so they woudl be normative if we
> >>> do the standard library.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On the side issue of "+" for string concatenation, I think that it would
> >>> be a good thing to add that to SPARQL.  I'm willing to do the editing
> >>> for it.
> >>>
> >>>         Andy
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:FunctionLibrary#XQuery_1.0_and_XPath_2.0_Functions_and_Operators
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd need one or two support replies to send it off.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Axel
> >>>>
> >>>> p.s.: This completes ACTION-265
> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/265
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> >>>>
> >>>> Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/
> >>>> shared innovation™
> >>>>
> >>>> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
> >>>>
> >>>> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
> --
> Dr. Alexandre Passant
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 16:37:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:43 GMT